这是一篇新的Peer Reviewed文章。
IgG4 Antibodies Induced by Repeated Vaccination May
Generate Immune Tolerance to the SARS-CoV-2 Spike Protein
Vladimir N. Uversky 1,* , Elrashdy M. Redwan 2,3 , William Makis 4 and Alberto Rubio-Casillas
Published: 17 May 2023
下面的文章总结了上文的几个重点 (见直接引语）：
https://www.coffeeandcovid.com/p/venomous-loretta-tuesday-may-30-2023
“As the immunity provided by these vaccines rapidly wanes, their ability to prevent hospitalization and severe disease in individuals with comorbidities has recently been questioned, and increasing evidence has shown that, as with many other vaccines, they do not produce sterilizing immunity, allowing people to suffer frequent re-infections.”
。。。
“[R]ecent investigations have found abnormally high levels of IgG4 in people who were administered two or more injections of the mRNA vaccines… [E]merging evidence suggests that the reported increase in IgG4 levels detected after repeated vaccination with the mRNA vaccines may not be a protective mechanism; rather, it constitutes an immune tolerance mechanism to the spike protein that could promote unopposed SARS-CoV2 infection and replication by suppressing natural antiviral responses. Increased IgG4 synthesis due to repeated mRNA vaccination with high antigen concentrations may also cause autoimmune diseases, and promote cancer growth and autoimmune myocarditis in susceptible individuals.”
My goodness. What they’re saying is, the safe and effective jabs could make people’s immune systems respond with “tolerance” — ignoring the spike protein altogether, since the body can’t get rid of it, its own cells keep making the damned things — and tolerance of spike could lead to:
1) Autoimmune diseases,
2) Cancer growth, and
3) Autoimmune myocarditis.
By “autoimmune myocarditis” they mean that the body is attacking its own heart. That can’t be good. And it definitely wasn’t good news for people who have dormant cancers.
Diagram shows how IgG4 interferes with the body’s cancer inhibitors.
I wonder if all the people who took the safest vaccines ever created would have wanted to know about this potential teeny-tiny problem before making their decisions?
。。。
。。。
If you plan to read only one study this year, this might be the one to read.